The last time I went to the countryside a nice police officer arrested me. On questioning, as to why I’d been detained, he limply offered, as his defence, that as they don’t get many ‘coloureds’ in Hereford he believed that my presence was slightly suspicious….and I was duly detained for questioning…until released without charge.
In hindsight, this does indeed all sound like a scene set in some small Mid-Western town as the lone drifter…that’s me in this analogy by the way…well, drifts into town …..and is harassed by the maniacal police chief content on keeping the good people of his Mid-Western town safe from ‘outsiders’.
So, as you can see, I have a lot in common with that famous drifter….no, silly not The Littlest Hobo….John Rambo of course.
Well, that cathartic release was offered up as the mise-en-scène for the fact that perhaps England for me is not symbolised by the countryside… that world, whenever I’ve been to it, has either stared rudely at me or arrested me.
So perhaps if I was say, going to photographically represent ‘England, I’d focus on the cities - where most of my life has been lived…the space where I’m not totally posited as ‘other’ and where there are other ‘swarthy’ looking types like my good self.
Photography of course is the taxonomy of our subjectivity…a series of subjective dialogues or personal discourses, if you will; the parameters of which we, as photographers, set and construct at will. So someone, if they so wished, could represent England of course, in any way, shape or fashion that fulfilled their own subjectivity.
Now people, I am well and truly down with this.
My England is not your England…and your England is not mine.
The flaw within this, alas, is that I seem to see more and more representations that are one’s I only ever see from my train window - on my journey to other cities….one’s that don’t ever include people who look like me or who share the same streets as me.
I seem to see an ever protracted vision of England that have removed my history in this country from the archives. Mono-cultured visions of country villages, fetes, festivals, rolling hills, green rolling hills, no, deep green joyous rolling hills that speak in hushed tones of the history of a glorious past that gave birth to a proud people who civilised the world….wait, did I mention the green rolling hills?
*You are accordingly invited to read that paragraph back again, but this time with Jerusalem being played in the background…*
Well any how, you get the message; I’m talking about the photographic equivalents of the BBC period costume drama…an image of England unsoiled by mass immigration…an image of England that never was and never will be.
The latest photographic work that attempts to represent a nation, We English by Simon Roberts, he uses as his leitmotif - to examine notions of Englishness - the English and their pastimes.
Now, when I first heard about this work I was interested to see how Mr. Roberts would depict the massed throng of drunks undertaking the nation’s favourite pastime of binge drinking as they gorge themselves on cheap booze and end up in the gutter.
I wanted to see him at that great English festival…the Notting Hill Carnival….and how he’d respond to all of the Red Stripe bottle holding ‘head, shoulders, knees and toes’ skankers dancing up an incoherent storm…and so I was saddened to hear that Roberts’ was only including ’pastimes’ taking part in the countryside….because that’s where the English live….right?
But why attempt to explain a people via their connections to the landscape when so few of us indeed have any connection to it? And why visit all of the tourist traps? With this in mind who is to say that – as the images are taken in tourist traps – that all of the people captured are indeed ‘English’?
Pedantic of me perhaps…but it’s an interesting question….what if some of the people who are being used to depict a nation aren’t actually English? Ok it’s not exactly a Ben Shahn moment, and anyway, of course, the people are inconsequential figures in relation to the land…the great imposing wild land of the countryside.
Now, OK there’s no need for me to declare an interest here…you’re right…I’ve got ‘beef’ with the countryside…but I decided to put this aside and look afresh at We English.
I really wanted to like this series. Especially as Roberts’ on his We English blog had previously ‘dissed’ Martin Parr’s own vision of England in his British cities work.
But I didn’t.
There are a number of stand out images…Roberts is a good photographer - there are bound to be. But at times I felt that I was looking at images of England from my train seat. A series of images that flashed by, without resonating; that attempted to reach out to me but couldn’t hold on.
It was if I sat dislocated and hermetically sealed away from them. I felt posited as that very same passenger behind glass…the dispassionate viewer to scenes that I was familiar with…but ambivalent to.
The more that I looked at the images the more they seemed to be one’s captured by a stranger…or outsider…to England (conversely, his images of ‘foreigners’ in Motherland are more intimate).
They seemed to be made by someone who felt separated and distanced from what he saw – someone at odds with and unable to approach those within the ‘country’ rather than someone who was celebrating it….or its people. Someone, who let’s just say, had been run out of town a few times by a despotic Sheriff….not someone who was in love with it.
Maybe I’m not Roberts’ target audience…and maybe as Roberts himself cites it’s unfair to judge his images as 72dpi jpegs. Regardless of this, I just didn’t make a connection to them…I didn’t ‘feel’ them or see myself within them…and once more I didn’t see my England.
But of course it isn’t up to Roberts to afford me this vision…or indeed pretend that he can….he can only afford me of his own image of the English. His search for what has made him.
Personally, I feel that the concept of Englishness is such an amorphous, subtle and nuanced…and let’s just say a damn right intangible concept to be discussed within photographs of ‘pastimes’.
But this is Roberts’ self-made discourse. Robert’s own vision…and you can’t kick a man for wanting to share this….but maybe he isn’t trying to convince ‘Us English’…but those further a field.
What the hell, they’ll do well amongst the Anglophiles of the world who love a romanticised image of an England made real by a green and pleasant imagination.
Beyond my cynicism though…I must add that I love this country. It is the country of my birth a world that has made me all that I am and all that I know….and I can understand someone wanting to examine what it is that has fashioned them.
Perhaps though, Roberts should have called his book ‘My English’.
As ultimately, of course, these images are only Roberts’ vision of his England…and it was misguided of me to ever expect to see mine within them.
Mine can only be made by me…
….and yours only ever by you.
To see Simon Robert’s images click here.
Good night, and good luck.